» BACK TO BODY PARTS MAIN

Posts Tagged ‘faith’

Wakeup Call, 2010

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

clockIt’s the last day of what has been, for many of us, a very trying year. It’s been a year of economic hardship and global terror, a year in which talk over climate change and health care shared headlines with scandal upon tawdry scandal. Good news? Hard to find much in 2009. Perhaps its fitting that the year’s last big news story would feature a man trying to blow up a plane with explosives stitched in his underwear.

But, in the midst of this not-so-fond adieu to 2009, here comes a reminder of who’s really in control.

On Christmas Eve, in my hometown of Colorado Springs, a child was born.

His name was Coltyn, and he was, for all intents and purposes, dead. His mother, Tracy Hermanstorfer, had also inexplicably died just minutes before in the throes of childbirth—a cardiac arrest, doctors said. According to The Gazette, husband Mike Hermanstorfer held her hand when her heart stopped beating. He felt his wife’s skin grow cold, watched it turn blue.

“I lost all feeling,” Mike said. “Once her heartbeat stopped, it felt like mine did, too.”

Doctors still hoped to save the baby, though, and they quickly wheeled the mother into surgery to perform an emergency Cesarean section. Yet when they pulled the baby from his mother’s body, he wasn’t breathing, either. He was, in the words of Dr. Stephanie Martin, “limp.”

But, as Mike held Coltyn in his hands, doctors continued to work until the baby sucked in his first breath. And then, in that bittersweet moment, Mike learned something else: His wife had, miraculously, come back to life.

“My legs went out from underneath me,” Mike told the Associated Press. “I had everything in the world taken from me, and in an hour and a half, I had everything given to me.”

Doctors can’t explain it. Dr. Stephanie Martin says that Tracy had “no heartbeat, no blood pressure, she wasn’t breathing.” Her skin was a deathly gray. But the Hermanstorfers know what happened.

“We are both believers … but this right here, even a nonbeliever—you explain to me how this happened,” Mike told AP. “There is no other explanation.”

Imagine being pulled from death’s maw to life again. Imagine the sense of glorious responsibility such a miracle leaves in its wake—the responsibility to live with joy and purpose, the duty to make your life mean something.

All of us, of course, are imbued with that same purpose. I believe our lives are part of a glorious tapestry, made knot-by-knot by a Divine hand. We can’t see this tapestry in its entirety—not yet—so our lives can feel pretty random, pretty confusing and pretty painful at times. But I have faith in the big picture: Faith that my talents (however meager they are), my experiences (however vexing they might be) and my life (however small it might seem) adds something meaningful to the whole.

But, in the midst of life’s messiness, God’s big picture is hard to imagine, much less see.

Tracy and Coltyn were given, in a way, a very special Christmas gift—a heart-stopping reminder that our lives are not our own, that we’re meant for something more. That we’re part of a bigger picture.

My New Year’s resolution (or, maybe, my New Year’s prayer) is this: To treat 2010 as the gift as it is, and to remember that my being—who I am, what I do, what I write—should be a gift, too. We are all gifts to the people around us—reminders of the One who sent us.

It’s almost 2010. The sun’s about to rise on a beautiful new year. Time to wake up.

Closet Christians

Monday, December 28th, 2009

Old_old_doorWe’ve still awash in eggnog over at my house, with important guests a-plenty for Christmas and New Year’s. But in the midst of Christmas caroling and the opening of presents and whatnot, I came across a pretty interesting essay at Salon.com by Ada Calhoun — a Christian who kept her faith a secret from her intellectual friends right up until this very essay.

Why am I so paranoid? I’m not cheating on my husband, committing crimes or doing drugs. But those are battles my cosmopolitan, progressive friends would understand. Many of them had to come out — as gay, as alcoholics, as artists in places where art was not valued. To them, my situation is far more sinister: I am the bane of their youth, the boogeyman of their politics, the very thing they left their small towns to escape. I am a Christian.

If you check out the post (and I recommend you do), you might notice that her own readers have very little sympathy. Salon.com is one of the Web’s more secular outlets, and many atheistic readers think it’s preposterous to think of Christians — who make up 80 percent or more of the country — as some sort of persecuted minority.

I get their reasoning. But at the same time, I know that I am, sadly, increasingly cautious when I talk about matters of faith with some of my more secular acquaintances. I make no bones about who I am or what I believe, but I do think there is, in some circles, a stigma to coming across as “too religious.” Perhaps this is nothing new … but it is new for me. 

Are Christians persecuted? No, I don’t think so. Not really. But I certainly don’t feel particularly ascendent, either. We still are part of the national dialogue. But are we its loudest voice? It doesn’t feel like it.

That Annoying Altruism

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

Christians, if we’re honest with ourselves, realize that our theology presents some painful problems at times — the biggest, perhaps, is why there’s so much pain and unfairness in the world. Most of us have come to grips with this issue in one way or another, but it can still be hard for some of us to grasp, particularly when it smacks us in the face.

But sometimes we forget that secularists and atheists have issues equally as thorny and provocative. Chuck Colson reminds us of one of them in Christianity Today — the problem of goodness. Consider:

Recent advances in neurobiology show that the impulse toward altruism may even be hardwired. For instance, practically from birth a baby who hears the cry of another baby will cry also. However, when scientists play a recording of the sound of that child’s own cry, rarely will the baby respond. By about 14 months, not only will that infant cry when he hears another infant crying, he will also try to soothe the other child in some way.

Yeah, a purely Darwinian explanation here just doesn’t quite seem to fit the bill, does it? Interesting, I think, that without faith, pain is easier to understand, but generosity, altruism and sacrifice are almost incomprehensible.

Christmas Light

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

candleAn archaeological dig in Nazareth, Israel, have uncovered what experts say is a home from the time of Jesus. Turns out, the entire city was about the same size as a city block in Philadelphia. Says Associated Press:

The dwelling and older discoveries of nearby tombs in burial caves suggest that Nazareth was an out-of-the-way hamlet of around 50 houses on a patch of about four acres. It was evidently populated by Jews of modest means who kept camouflages grottos to hide from Roman invaders, said archaeologist Yardena Alexandre, excavations director at the Israel Antiquities Authority.

For me, this story came around at just the right time.

Maybe it’s just me, but the Christmas spirit seems to be a little off-kilter this year. Every day, I see another story of the season going south: Jesus shooting Santa in a holiday display. A priest advising his congregants to shoplift. Thieves robbing a daycare center of all its presents, food and even Christmas tree. And that’s in addition to our regular docket of news (Recession! Terrorism! Health care!). There’s so much noise and confusion this Christmas season that it’s easy — for me, at least — to lose sight of the fact that this is meant to be a time of joy and celebration.

But then, I hear about Nazareth, and I’m reminded about a world-size miracle born in the smallest of packages. I imagine how Nazareth might’ve looked in Jesus’ time — A handful of tiny houses huddled near places of hiding, filled with real people beset by problems big and small. I wonder … did Jesus, as a child, play in the streets with neighborhood kids? Did he crouch next to a wall and talk with his Father? Did he walk through the hills, counting the days as he neared his baptism, his ministry, his death, his life? Did the people around him know there was something different about him?

I initially read this story yesterday — Dec. 21, the shortest day of the year. While we Christians can’t know the exact date of Jesus’ birth, there’s no doubt as to why the early Church picked late December as when to celebrate it. How appropriate to be given a light in the darkest part of the year. How fitting we were given a spark of hope in the midst of winter’s sometimes hopeless chill. 

We have not been relieved of our worries. Our lives are filled with strife, pain and pettiness. Frustrations and fears beset us from every side. But this time of year, we remember that our problems, as real and as hurtful as they are, are products of the darkness we live in. A glorious light has come to us, though. For unto us a child is born.

Religious Persecution Still Thrives

Friday, December 18th, 2009

According to the Pew Research Center, nearly a third of the world’s countries are home to some serious religious persecution, be it formally from the government or informally, from a faith-hostile populace. That equates to about 70 percent of the world’s population, since many of these persecution havens also are among the most crowded.

Most of the persecution, naturally, falls on religious minorities. In Islamic Indonesia, Muslims burned down a mosque belonging to a rival faction, according to an Associated Press story. The government of Singapore won’t recognize Jehovah’s Witnesses. Islamic countries tend to be among the most restrictive, both in terms of governmental and street-level persecution (Iran, Egypt, Indonesia and Pakistan are among the world’s persecution front-runners), but China (technically atheist) and India (largely Hindu) also don’t do very well in Pew’s study.

And They’ll Know We Are Christians By Our … Plagiarism?

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

 

Charles Darwin

Charles Darwin

And we Christians wonder why sometimes non-Christians don’t trust us very much.

You may have heard that the Christian group Living Waters, led by New Zealand evangelist Charles Comfort, was handing out Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species” on college campuses across the country.  Comfort, naturally, wasn’t just interested in commemorating the 150th anniversary of the book: Rather, Comfort served up a nifty little rebuttal of evolution and also pointed out that Darwin’s work has been used to bolster racism. He was, in short, taking the classic tome of evolution and using it against evolutionists.

Turns out, Comfort was also allegedly taking  someone else’s introduction.

Stan Guffey, a professor at the University of Tennessee, is a Darwin booster who, in 1997, wrote a three-page biography on Darwin that was handed out on campus and eventually was used on a pro-Darwin Web site. Now, Guffey alleges that Comfort just picked up his biography and used it practically verbatim in Living Water’s introduction to “Origin of Species,” according to Rikki Hall, writing for Metro Pulse.

Comfort put his introduction on the Web months ago, and several bloggers who monitor anti-evolution efforts noted differences in style between the biography and the rest of the introduction. A brief computer search uncovered the source, and they confronted the author and publisher about the apparent plagiarism months before the book was printed. Guffey says he was never contacted for permission to use the biography. Both the author and publisher declined to comment for this story. Contacted by phone, [publisher] Bridge-Logos publicist Shawn Myers said it was the first she had heard of matter, so she was unable to respond.

Now, I’m on record as saying that God and evolution can coexist quite nicely: Evolution doesn’t threaten my faith at all, and frankly, I think there are more pressing matters facing Christians these days.

But, if you’re going to take on the scientific community by utilizing their most “sacred” book, you gotta make sure that your behavior is above reproach. To plagiarize someone else’s work is a fine way to undermine the rest of the project, if you ask me. And it kinda violates the whole “thou shalt not steal” commandment, too.

Really, that whole “living above reproach” thing is a good motto for Christians pert near all the time, don’t you think?