» BACK TO BODY PARTS MAIN

Posts Tagged ‘evangelical’

Changing the Tone?

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

 

Christopher Hitchens. Photo by ensceptico

Christopher Hitchens. Photo by ensceptico

Christopher Hitchens, author of “God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything,” has been debating religious leaders for a good long while now, traveling from campus to campus, auditorium to auditorium, arguing the (I think ludicrous) point that faith is an unqualified, unrepentant force for evil. 

 

But perhaps, in spending so much time with real flesh-and-blood people, Hitchens may be ever-so-slightly softening. Look at this line from a column he recently wrote for Slate:

I haven’t yet run into an argument that has made me want to change my mind. After all, a believing religious person, however brilliant or however good in debate, is compelled to stick fairly closely to a “script” that is known in advance, and known to me, too. However, I have discovered that the so-called Christian right is much less monolithic, and very much more polite and hospitable, than I would once have thought, or than most liberals believe. I haven’t been asked to Bob Jones University yet, but I have been invited to Jerry Falwell’s old Liberty University campus in Virginia, even though we haven’t yet agreed on the terms.

I doubt Hitchens will ever decide he’s been wrong all these years and convert to Christianity (or another religion). He now has, in fact, all sorts of public and financial incentives for remaining the staunch atheist he is. But I’m encouraged that, while he may not agree with what we believe, he perhaps sees a glimpse of the people who we are: Christians are no longer people of the “they,” but people who he’s met with, talked with, perhaps even eaten with. 

I think it’s much harder to hate a group of people once we meet them. Hitchens, to his credit, has met us where we live. And perhaps, in so doing, there resides a faint flicker of hope that Hitchens and his fellow “angry atheists” may not stay quite so angry.

Harry Potter and the Missing Medal

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

16potter.large5Former President George W. Bush sang the praises of J.K. Rowling, author of the wildly popular (and, in my opinion, very good) Harry Potter series. But according to a former Bush speechwriter, the Bush administration declined to give Rowling the Presidential Medal of Freedom because she repeatedly referenced witchcraft in them.

Matt Latimer makes the allegations in his book, “Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor,” and while the decision may look foolish now, frankly, I can understand how something like this happens. The Potter books were widely condemned from many conservative Christians when Rowling first started churning them out, and evangelicals were, of course, the cornerstone of Bush’s political support. If I was President, I’d be tempted not to anger my most boisterous supporters, too.

In hindsight, of course, the decision feels kind of silly. Not only were Rowling’s books wildly popular, not only were they extremely well written, but the final book contains, I think, one of the most mature ruminations on faith and doubt and the beauty of Christianity I’ve ever read. Not that I expect Rowling’s too torn up about it. Selling around 300 million books tends to salve a lot of wounds.

A None’s Life

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

 

St. Peter Hungate in Norwich. A new study suggests that fewer people are going to church these days, joining the ranks of the "nones."

St. Peter Hungate in Norwich. A new study suggests that fewer people are going to church these days, joining the ranks of the "nones."

Trinity College released a study yesterday titled American Nones: Profile of the No Religion Population. It shows something we’ve known for a while: The United States is growing more secular. Sorta.

 

About 15 percent of Americans claim no religious affiliation. But, when you look at Americans between the ages of 18 and 29, that figure rises to 22 percent. More than two-thirds of these so-called “nones” were raised in some sort of faith tradition (about 35 percent say they were Catholic through at least the age of 12) and, strangely, about a third of American nones have at least a partly Irish heritage.

 According to the study, this secular boom really took root in the 1990s, when it seems as though the Religious Right was also gathering some serious steam. Is some of this trend toward “nonedom” a reaction to modern Christian conservatism? I wouldn’t hazard a guess, but I do know that previous polls have suggested that many younger folks — even many evangelicals — say that religion has become “too political.” 

But the study isn’t without qualifiers: While the percentage of nones is rising steadily, the percent of folks who claim to be atheists is not growing. Indeed, more than half say they believe in God.

“It’s not as though dozens of people at the Methodist Church read (atheist Richard) Dawkins and suddenly decided God doesn’t exist,” lead researcher Barry Kosmin told USA Today.

Men, for some reason, are more likely to stray from the faith they were raised with: Six out of 10 nones are male. About 21 percent of political independents are nones, compared to 16 percent Democrats and 8 percent Republicans.

And In This Corner … Church

Thursday, September 17th, 2009

581px-Mixed_Martial_Arts_Project_SymbolThe New York Times gives us a peak at how the evangelical movement is manifesting itself in Brazil, one of the world’s most Catholic countries. And it includes an awful lot of fighting. Here’s the lead:

The atmosphere was electric at Reborn in Christ Church on “Extreme Fight” night. Churchgoers dressed in jeans and sneakers, many with ball caps turned backward, lined a makeshift boxing ring to cheer on bare-chested jujitsu fighters. …

With the crowd still buzzing, Pastor Mazola Maffei, dressed in army pants and a T-shirt, grabbed a microphone. Pastor Maffei, who is also Pastor Meira’s fight trainer, then held the crowd rapt with a sermon about the connection between sports and spirituality.

“You need to practice the sport of spirituality more,” he urged. “You need to fight for your life, for your dreams and ideals.”

The Times tells us that about 15 percent of Brazilians describe themselves as evangelicals these days — quintuple the number who said so 50 years ago. They’re attracted to the movement because, in part, of the freedom of worship: Evangelical churches are obviously unfettered by many of the rituals found in the Catholic Church and, apparently, attract folks through their doors with mixed martial arts fights, raggae and makeshift tattoo parlors.

I’ve been to a lot of churches stateside, but I’ve yet to go to one that’s hosted a cage match or allowed me to get some new ink. When we hear about the burgeoning worldwide Christian church, I think I sometimes make the mistake of assuming they all worship much like I do: Some nice, tuneful worship music, a 40-minute sermon, coffee and donuts afterward.

That’s obviously not the case. But the question is, is that a bad thing? Does mixing MMA fighting with Christianity bother you? Or does it excite you? Let me know. I’d love to hear.

Cultivating Culture

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

 

El Greco's Pieta

El Greco's Pieta

The Evangelical Outpost, one of my favorite blogs, tipped me off to a pretty fascinating essay at The Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse. Both the original essay (by Matthew Milliner) and Tim Bartel’s take at the Outpost are both worth reading, but if I could sum up the theme of both in two sentences, it’d be this:

 

Conservatives (and evangelicals) are all-pro culture warriors, but they’re pretty amateurish when it comes to actual culture. And we really should get better.

Bartel notes that we evangelicals are trying to do better, but he worries that this new emphasis on culture is maybe more “fad” than a true cultural resurgence. “In the late 90s Christians watched Veggie Tales,” he writes. “In the late 2009 they ‘create culture,’ and maybe by 2015 they will have taken up roller-blading.”

I don’t mean to be pessimistic, because I think that Milliner is absolutely right, and that this call to care about and create culture is a much greater than a fad.  Fads take place within culture, not the other way around.  The problem with Christian fad-mongering and the problem with liberal take-over of the aesthetic realms are the same.  This problem lies in the difference between the art that replaces traditional doctrine and values and the art that doctrine and values plan for and protect.  The former type of art is predicated on the assumption that aesthetic theory and artistic creation occupy the same cultural space as theology and religious practice, and that because of this, one must make way for the other; there is no room for both.

I completely agree with Bartel. But that said, it’s imperative we use the arts to support the doctrine and values we hold so dear. Because while our values may be eternal, culture carries them forward.   

Art, music, storytelling and the like convey truths from generation to generation. They are found in the marble of Michelangelo, through the intricacies of Bach, through the stories of C.S. Lewis. Even in the Bible, it’s the stories that stick with us: Jesus spoke in parables because we’re wired to respond to them. And, let’s face it: More of us would remember Leviticus a bit more if the author had thrown a story or two in there.

For Today’s NIV, There’s No Tomorrow

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

 

Close-up of a Bible originally published in 1407

Close-up of a Bible originally published in 1407

Biblica, copyright holder for the wildly popular New International Version of the Bible, announced it’ll be updating the NIV over the next couple of years. The new version of the, um, New International Version will be on bookshelves in 2011.

 

The announcement officially ends the brief and stormy life of Biblica’s controversial Today’s New International Version, the New Coke of Bible publishing. Biblica announced it’ll no longer release products using the translation.

When the TNIV was released in 2005, it was reputed to be the coolest translation since someone had the bright idea to throw little numbers in the text and call them “verses.” But when folks heard that the TNIV was “gender neutral,” much of the evangelical world rose up to smite the version down.

Many of the translation’s opponents assumed, I think, that God had suddenly turned gender neutral in the TNIV — that our Holy Father might be occasionally be referred to as Holy Mother and such. To my understanding, the translation’s gender neutrality extended mainly to groups of mortals, Which doesn’t seem to be that big of a deal to me. 

But the damage was done, and the TNIV became the rare Bible hated by Bible lovers. Biblica — a Colorado Springs-based organization that was called International Bible Society when I was covering it — even had one angry reader return a TNIV  with a shotgun hole in the middle. 

 With the TNIV now going the way of eight-track players, Sega systems and (one can hope) celebreality T.V., perhaps my New Testament TNIV is something of a collector’s item. And personally, I’m sad to see the translation go. 

Of course, I kinda had a taste for New Coke, too.