» BACK TO BODY PARTS MAIN

Posts Tagged ‘culture’

Look Out, Hollywood

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

Clap_Clapboard_BlankSome Christians are pretty excited that, over here in America, it looks like we might be seeing a bit of a surge in Christian-tinged filmmaking. But, according to Christianity Today, we’re far behind the curve. Nollywood — shorthand for the burgeoning film industry in Nigeria, Africa — is churning out faith-tinged films by the score. About a fifth of the nearly 900 films churned out by Nollywood in 2006 — almost 200 films — were considered Christian.

Not that even Christians there are uniformly thrilled. Sounds like Nigerian believers have many of the same discussions we have here: Are we transforming culture, or are we being transformed by it? Are we tools for Christ? Or are we using Christianity as a tool to sell more stuff? 

 While Nollywood looks remarkably Christian compared to Hollywood, some Lagos pastors and film producers think Nigeria’s film industry is full of idolatry and social evils and don’t want their ministries associated with it. In 1995 the National Film and Video Censors Board tracked almost 200 G-rated movies and few others. By 2005 over 1,300 movies rated 18-and-older were outpacing G movies by 6 to 1.

“Half of the Christian movies are not done by faith-based organizations, but by directors who want to take advantage of the strong religious inclinations of Nigerians to sell [movies],” [Nigerian arts and culture reporter Obidike] Okafor said. “The others do it to promote their faith.” 

I’d be interested to see a Nollywood produced movie. Would you? Have you?

Crumb From the Table

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

Legendarily subversive graphic artist R. Crumb — the guy behind the X-rated cartoon “Fritz the Cat” — has turned his considerable talent to the Bible, but the results are not to everyone’s liking. The artist, who calls himself a gnostic, has illustrated the entire book of Genesis over 200-plus pages, and the cover warns readers that nothing’s been left out — not even the naughty bits.

You can see a few pages of the book here, and from what I can tell from the few pages reproduced, the illustrations seem to be fairly straightforward. Certainly, Crumb’s God strikes me as fairly humorless, but beyond that, there’s nothing overtly satirical or snarky in the work, as far as I can see. ”I don’t think ‘Genesis’ is a good place to look for spiritual guidance or moral guidance,” Crumb tells the Associated Presscrumb. “I don’t believe it’s the word of God. At the same time, I think the stories are very powerful. I’m not out to ridicule them or belittle them.”

That hasn’t stopped some news outlets from saying he’s doing just that. The Fox News site, which published the very AP article in which Crumb’s comments are printed, heads the article with, “Comic-Strip Artist R. Crumb Mocks Book of Genesis.” 

GetReligion also has a good take on Crumb’s illustrated Genesis, with Steve Rabey declaring that “Crumb has applied his gifts to creating a visually stunning retelling of Genesis’s key stories that can help readers/viewers appreciate these texts in new and compelling ways.”

Mockery? Or a stunning retelling? Maybe it’s worth taking a look. I’d love to hear what you think.

I’m A Fan. U2?

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

 

U2's Bono

U2's Bono

Christianity  is full of paradox. I think paradox is part of the faith’s very DNA: The King born in a manger; victory found in shameful death; the promise that, in order to save one’s life, one must give it away.

 

So it only makes sense that Christianity — the force that almost singlehandedly preserved the cultural achievements of ancient Greece and Rome, the foundation of so much of the Western World’s art, literature and philosophy, the entity that’s so woven into our cultural sensibilities that no atheist movement on earth can drive them apart — is, at its core, the most countercultural movement on earth.

That’s a long prelude to introduce the actual theme of this post: An outstanding essay on U2’s Bono by one of my favorite bloggers, Steve Beard. Beard, founder of the faith-and-culture roundup known as Thunderstruck, suggests that Bono — that hard-rocking Irishman — has become one of Christianity’s most effective evangelists. And, as such, Bono is wrapped in paradox.

Beard offers this example:

Bono has the reputation as rock ‘n’ roll’s most effective and enigmatic spiritual provocateur — rattling the souls of fans all over the globe. “I sometimes think I have a kind of Tourette’s syndrome where if you’re not supposed to say something, it becomes very attractive to do so,” he once confessed. “You’re in a rock band — what can’t you talk about? God? OK, here we go. You’re supposed to write songs about sex and drugs. Well, no I won’t.”

And then there’s this:

There is very little garden-variety Evangelicalism (in the North American sense of the word) found in the members of the band. They drink, smoke, swear, and wear leather pants. But there is a hefty and poetic theological substance that I think would startle St. Paul and would bring a smile to the Psalmist. This rock ‘n’ roll band is committed to social justice and eternal truth. In this day and age, that is no small luxury.

Bono disappointed several Christians I know when he made a cameo in Sasha Baren Cohen’s crudely provocative “Bruno” this summer. Many felt it beneath this rock star who, as time goes on, seems to poetically preach more and more with each passing album. For me, it felt like just one more pebble of paradox: The sort of enigmatic and sometimes incomprehensible paradox we all — and Christianity itself — is made of.

Cultivating Culture

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

 

El Greco's Pieta

El Greco's Pieta

The Evangelical Outpost, one of my favorite blogs, tipped me off to a pretty fascinating essay at The Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse. Both the original essay (by Matthew Milliner) and Tim Bartel’s take at the Outpost are both worth reading, but if I could sum up the theme of both in two sentences, it’d be this:

 

Conservatives (and evangelicals) are all-pro culture warriors, but they’re pretty amateurish when it comes to actual culture. And we really should get better.

Bartel notes that we evangelicals are trying to do better, but he worries that this new emphasis on culture is maybe more “fad” than a true cultural resurgence. “In the late 90s Christians watched Veggie Tales,” he writes. “In the late 2009 they ‘create culture,’ and maybe by 2015 they will have taken up roller-blading.”

I don’t mean to be pessimistic, because I think that Milliner is absolutely right, and that this call to care about and create culture is a much greater than a fad.  Fads take place within culture, not the other way around.  The problem with Christian fad-mongering and the problem with liberal take-over of the aesthetic realms are the same.  This problem lies in the difference between the art that replaces traditional doctrine and values and the art that doctrine and values plan for and protect.  The former type of art is predicated on the assumption that aesthetic theory and artistic creation occupy the same cultural space as theology and religious practice, and that because of this, one must make way for the other; there is no room for both.

I completely agree with Bartel. But that said, it’s imperative we use the arts to support the doctrine and values we hold so dear. Because while our values may be eternal, culture carries them forward.   

Art, music, storytelling and the like convey truths from generation to generation. They are found in the marble of Michelangelo, through the intricacies of Bach, through the stories of C.S. Lewis. Even in the Bible, it’s the stories that stick with us: Jesus spoke in parables because we’re wired to respond to them. And, let’s face it: More of us would remember Leviticus a bit more if the author had thrown a story or two in there.