» BACK TO BODY PARTS MAIN

Posts Tagged ‘conservatism’

Chesterton: Living Large

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

 

G.K. Chesterton

G.K. Chesterton

Well, it’s been a pretty frantic weekend, so I don’t think I’ll write much. Rather, I’ll direct you to this thoughtful musing on G.K. Chesterton, perhaps my favorite Christian writer of the last century or so.

 

Chesterton, for those who aren’t familiar with him, was one of England’s greatest wits at the turn of the last century. He wrote endlessly on a huge variety of topics (he authored the still popular “Father Brown” series of mystery stories), but his musings on Christianity are, I think, incredibly relevant today — far more relevant, in some ways, than I expect they were in his own time: He has a talent for the soundbite and a gift for charming self-deprication. And “Orthodoxy,” which celebrated its 100th anniversary last year, I believe, sounds like a clarion call to Christianity in a postmodern world.

I’d encourage you to pick up “Orthodoxy,” if you’ve never read it. But, barring that, check out this page of quotations that hint at Chesterton’s wit but barely brush the surface of his wisdom. My favorite: “You cannot grow a beard in a moment of passion.”

Religion and Politics: Praying for the Other Side

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

David Waters posted an interesting story on The Washington Post’s “On Faith” blog, about how The Liberty Counsel is asking its members to “Adopt a Liberal” and actively pray for them. 

Liberty’s prayer list of liberals includes Democrats and Republicans — President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, but also California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

“Pick one or more of the liberals from the list we have posted online at www.LC.org, or choose your own liberal(s) to adopt,” Liberty requests. “Pray earnestly and intensely for them! Pray that the Lord would move upon them and cause them to be the kind of leaders who will encourage others to lead ‘a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence.’ We encourage you to seek the Lord’s guidance on how to pray for your liberal(s), always allowing Him to temper your prayer with His love and mercy.”

The drive implies, of course, that liberals can’t be Christian. Which, considering traditional progressive stances on such issues as abortion and same-sex marriage, some of you might agree with. Then again, perhaps there are liberal Christians out there — perhaps even reading this blog — that feel some traditionally conservative positions are inherently un-Christian, too. 

Me, I gravitate toward this post by John Shore, who’s ”exhausted with conservative Christians thinking liberal Christians wouldn’t know God’s will from a venti soy caramel latte with extra foam, and with liberal Christians thinking conservative Christians are inbred morons.”  But that’s just me.

That ‘Other’ Baldwin Brother

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

Stephen Baldwin. Photo courtesy lukeford.net

Stephen Baldwin. Photo courtesy lukeford.net

Slate magazine, an excellent online publication that has been known to be rather critical of religion at times, ran a story on Stephen Baldwin and his involvement with the Values Voter Conference, held last week in Washington, D.C. Baldwin was primarily speaking to teens at the conference, and the story suggests the one-time actor, now full-time Christian, is attempting to mold a new, politically active Moral Majority. 

Author Christopher Beam, though clearly wary of politically active evangelicalism, gave credit where credit is due: 

[Kevin] McCullough has known Baldwin only since 2004, but by all accounts, he says, Stephen is a different person from the tabloid-fodder Hollywood star. “What his brothers will tell you is, they may not like his politics, but they can’t argue with the fact that he was once a womanizer, a drug addict, an alcoholic, an addictive personality who has been set free from all of those things.”

What most people see as a plummeting career—few would recognize any of his 30 or so movies since Half-Baked—has in fact been a deliberate rejection of Hollywood, according to McCullough. “When he came to faith, he still could have done the ‘Here, show your butt cheek and make love to this woman, and we’ll pay you $4 million.’ ” But he didn’t. Instead, he has dedicated himself to more Christian-themed movies.

It was an interesting piece — worth a look, if you’re so inclined. But in its preoccupation with politics, I do think perhaps the more important story of Baldwin’s path to Jesus, and his transformative faith, went underreported. But I’d be interested to hear what you think.

A None’s Life

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

 

St. Peter Hungate in Norwich. A new study suggests that fewer people are going to church these days, joining the ranks of the "nones."

St. Peter Hungate in Norwich. A new study suggests that fewer people are going to church these days, joining the ranks of the "nones."

Trinity College released a study yesterday titled American Nones: Profile of the No Religion Population. It shows something we’ve known for a while: The United States is growing more secular. Sorta.

 

About 15 percent of Americans claim no religious affiliation. But, when you look at Americans between the ages of 18 and 29, that figure rises to 22 percent. More than two-thirds of these so-called “nones” were raised in some sort of faith tradition (about 35 percent say they were Catholic through at least the age of 12) and, strangely, about a third of American nones have at least a partly Irish heritage.

 According to the study, this secular boom really took root in the 1990s, when it seems as though the Religious Right was also gathering some serious steam. Is some of this trend toward “nonedom” a reaction to modern Christian conservatism? I wouldn’t hazard a guess, but I do know that previous polls have suggested that many younger folks — even many evangelicals — say that religion has become “too political.” 

But the study isn’t without qualifiers: While the percentage of nones is rising steadily, the percent of folks who claim to be atheists is not growing. Indeed, more than half say they believe in God.

“It’s not as though dozens of people at the Methodist Church read (atheist Richard) Dawkins and suddenly decided God doesn’t exist,” lead researcher Barry Kosmin told USA Today.

Men, for some reason, are more likely to stray from the faith they were raised with: Six out of 10 nones are male. About 21 percent of political independents are nones, compared to 16 percent Democrats and 8 percent Republicans.

Liberty, Give Me … Democrats?

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Considering Liberty University was founded by the late Jerry Falwell, founder of the Moral Majority and one of the pillars of Christian conservatism, it’s perhaps not that surprising that students ran into a problem when they formed a College Democrats club there. As Amy Sullivan over at Time suggested, the real shocker is that such a group formed in the first place.

Indeed, when Brian Diaz first proposed the club last fall, he was flabbergasted the college, located in Lynchburg, Va., approved it. The group was able to campaign for Barack Obama last fall and celebrate his inauguration this January.

But on May 15, Diaz received word, via e-mail, that Liberty was removing any mention of the club from its Web site, and that the College Democrats would be, er,  de-officialized.

Even though this club may not support the more radical planks of the democratic party, the democratic party is still the parent organization of the club on campus. The Democratic Party Platform is contrary to the mission of LU and to Christian doctrine (supports abortion, federal funding of abortion, advocates repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, promotes the “LGBT” agenda, Hate Crimes, which include sexual orientation and gender identity, socialism, etc). … By using LU or Liberty University and Democrat in the name, the two are associated and the goals of both run in opposite directions.

The controversy led many media folks to believe that Liberty’s College Democrats club had been, essentially, outlawed. Most media reports I read indicated the group was being forced to off-campus–a conclusion I might’ve jumped to, too, considering the e-mail sent to Diaz included the following quote from Liberty’s “Students Clubs and Organizations Policies:” 

No student club or organization shall be approved, recognized or permitted to meet on campus, (my bold) advertise, distribute or post materials, or use University facilities if the statements, positions, doctrines, policies, constitutions, bylaws, platforms, activities or events of such club or organization, its parent, affiliate, chapter or similarly named group (even if the similarly named group is not the actual parent, affiliate or chapter) are inconsistent or in conflict with the distinctly Christian mission of the University, the Liberty Way, the Honor Code, or the policies and procedures promulgated by the University.

But hold yer horses, there, buckeroos. In an op-ed piece to the Christian Newswire, Liberty President and Chancellor Jerry Falwell, Jr., said that the club wasn’t being kicked out–just being distanced from Liberty’s official seal. After all, the parents who pay for their kids to go to Liberty aren’t coughing up good tuition money to see their kids go all liberal on them.

“While students are free to meet on campus, debate and discuss politics of every stripe,” Falwell writes, “the University will remain true to its’ core principles and not lend its’ name or fund groups that work to undermine the principles that make Liberty attractive to so many people.”

Hmmm. Lots of interesting issues surrounding this story. Love to hear from you as to what the biggest might be.