» BACK TO BODY PARTS MAIN

Posts Tagged ‘apologetics’

Changing the Tone?

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

 

Christopher Hitchens. Photo by ensceptico

Christopher Hitchens. Photo by ensceptico

Christopher Hitchens, author of “God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything,” has been debating religious leaders for a good long while now, traveling from campus to campus, auditorium to auditorium, arguing the (I think ludicrous) point that faith is an unqualified, unrepentant force for evil. 

 

But perhaps, in spending so much time with real flesh-and-blood people, Hitchens may be ever-so-slightly softening. Look at this line from a column he recently wrote for Slate:

I haven’t yet run into an argument that has made me want to change my mind. After all, a believing religious person, however brilliant or however good in debate, is compelled to stick fairly closely to a “script” that is known in advance, and known to me, too. However, I have discovered that the so-called Christian right is much less monolithic, and very much more polite and hospitable, than I would once have thought, or than most liberals believe. I haven’t been asked to Bob Jones University yet, but I have been invited to Jerry Falwell’s old Liberty University campus in Virginia, even though we haven’t yet agreed on the terms.

I doubt Hitchens will ever decide he’s been wrong all these years and convert to Christianity (or another religion). He now has, in fact, all sorts of public and financial incentives for remaining the staunch atheist he is. But I’m encouraged that, while he may not agree with what we believe, he perhaps sees a glimpse of the people who we are: Christians are no longer people of the “they,” but people who he’s met with, talked with, perhaps even eaten with. 

I think it’s much harder to hate a group of people once we meet them. Hitchens, to his credit, has met us where we live. And perhaps, in so doing, there resides a faint flicker of hope that Hitchens and his fellow “angry atheists” may not stay quite so angry.

Six Degrees of G.K. Chesterton

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

 

G. K. Chesterton

G. K. Chesterton

So what does G.K. Chesterton, the renowned turn-of-the-(20th)-century author, journalist and theological thinker, have to do with the left-leaning philanthropic/activist group ACORN? What might link these two disparate entities together?

Well, according to The New York Times and GetReligion.com, it’d be James E. O’Keefe.

O’Keefe, the conservative “gotcha”-journalist who caught ACORN officials, on tape, helpfully offering advice on how to set up illicit brothels, is a big Chesterton fan. The Times says:

Mr. O’Keefe said he considers the British writer G. K. Chesterton his “intellectual backbone” and called himself a “progressive radical,” not a conservative, because he wants to change things, “not conserve them.” But his pro-market, anti-government views, as he described them, sounded like mainstream conservatism.

The article doesn’t say whether O’Keefe thinks Chesterton’s theological musings are groovy, as well, but it would stand to reason: Much of Chesterton’s most popular work is in the realm of Christian apologetics, and he was a critical influence (as GetReligion notes) on a certain C.S. Lewis, who also was something of a Christian thinker. Moreover, Chesterton’s best-known theological work, the century-old “Orthodoxy,” is not only intellectually stimulating but has a beautifully poetic, post-modernist bent that feels incredibly contemporary — a persuasive work for a provocateur like O’Keefe

 who’s all of 25 years old. While paradox tends to make modernists feel all queasy-like (and most of the modern evangelical movement is based on modernist thinking), Chesterton embraces it, and it shows in his every turn of phrase. And yet he revels in traditionalism, as well. And it contains some of the prettiest moments you’ll ever read.

One may understand the cosmos, but never the ego; the self is more distant than any star. We are all under the same mental calamity; we have all forgotten our names. We have all forgotten what we really are. … All that we call spirit and art and ecstasy only means that for one awful instant we remember that we forget.

I’d highly recommend cracking open a copy of “Orthodoxy,” if you haven’t already. While I didn’t find everything he said persuasive, there were moments of, I think, pure genius.

God Is Back? Where Did He Go?

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

book coverHistory has a way of repeating itself.

A couple millenia ago, the powers of the age tried to kill and bury God. Three days later, He came back, making all His doubters look pretty foolish. And now, even after all this time, God still won’t stay dead and buried. 

That is, in so many words (and a little embellishment) the scholarly take of John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge in their collaborative book, “God is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World.” The journalists, two leading lights for The Economist (Micklethwait is the prestigious magazine’s editor-in-chief),  come from different ends of the theological spectrum — Micklethwait’s a Catholic and Wooldridge is an atheist — but they conclude in their book that faith is far from dead: Rather, it’s been rejuvenated through the unlikeliest of circumstances.

Timothy Samuel Shah wrote an essay about the book for Foreign Affairs — titled, cleverly, “Born Again in the U.S.A.” “What they find,” he says, “is that many of the forces that were supposed to consign the Almighty to the ash heap of history — or to a quiet corner of the living room — have only made Him stronger.”

And among those forces, the authors argue, was America’s entrepreneurial spirit. Shah writes:

Beyond discovering that God still has a pulse, Micklethwait and Wooldridge give a firsthand account of how religious groups all over the world — from family ministries in the United States and megachurches in South Korea to televangelists in Egypt — use modern methods to convert people. The result is more Robert Capa than Max Weber: arresting snapshots of bubbling religiosity rather than elaborate theories about the causes and consequences of the global religious revival. But the snapshots support an argument: that the United States’ increasingly competitive religious market has incubated a form of entrepreneurial faith — a religious style that is conservative at its doctrinal core but restlessly innovative in its techniques of organization and communication.

I think that’s true. Look in most large evangelical churches and what do you see? Worship bands. Big screens. Coffee shops. Behind the scenes you’ll see many organizations that tick with the precision of a Fortune 500 company.

Some of us bemoan these trappings at times — and at times, I think, with good reason. We can lose ourselves in our bells and whistles. But the instinct behind it all — to reach the unreached, to make people feel comfortable, to feel at home — is a good one. And it has kept faith strong and relevant for millions of people.

Let me confess something: Belief doesn’t come easily to me. I’m a skeptical cuss prone to the blues, and there are days when I wake up and feel sadly, fearfully, alone. On days like these, I don’t push reason aside: Rather, I embrace it. Because even when I don’t feel God is there, I know he is.

And the very fact that Christianity has endured, so improbably under so trying of circumstances for so many centuries, is one of the many reasons I know it. The history of Christianity sometimes seems so outlandish when you read about it. And yet, here she is — not a fictional fairy tale, but a force that has, so far, outlived all her critics: Beautiful and scarred, always changing, always constant. And it sounds as though a whiff of that can be found in “God is Back.”

Of course, I have a quibble with the title. After all, God never left.