Support for Abortion Dips

October 5th, 2009

GodisprolifewashingtonrallyThere are almost as many pro-lifers as pro-choicers, according to a new survey by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. About 45 percent of folks say abortion should be outlawed in all or most cases now, compared to 47 percent who say it should almost always be legal.

Why the switch?

“While no single reason for the shift is apparent, the pattern of changes suggests that the election of a pro-choice Democrat as president may be a contributing factor,’’ Andrew Kohut, the Pew Research Center’s president, told Heidi Przybyla of the Bloomberg News.

Religion and Politics: Praying for the Other Side

October 2nd, 2009

David Waters posted an interesting story on The Washington Post’s “On Faith” blog, about how The Liberty Counsel is asking its members to “Adopt a Liberal” and actively pray for them. 

Liberty’s prayer list of liberals includes Democrats and Republicans — President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, but also California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

“Pick one or more of the liberals from the list we have posted online at www.LC.org, or choose your own liberal(s) to adopt,” Liberty requests. “Pray earnestly and intensely for them! Pray that the Lord would move upon them and cause them to be the kind of leaders who will encourage others to lead ‘a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence.’ We encourage you to seek the Lord’s guidance on how to pray for your liberal(s), always allowing Him to temper your prayer with His love and mercy.”

The drive implies, of course, that liberals can’t be Christian. Which, considering traditional progressive stances on such issues as abortion and same-sex marriage, some of you might agree with. Then again, perhaps there are liberal Christians out there — perhaps even reading this blog — that feel some traditionally conservative positions are inherently un-Christian, too. 

Me, I gravitate toward this post by John Shore, who’s ”exhausted with conservative Christians thinking liberal Christians wouldn’t know God’s will from a venti soy caramel latte with extra foam, and with liberal Christians thinking conservative Christians are inbred morons.”  But that’s just me.

Would You Share Your Pew With a Zombie?

October 1st, 2009

zombielandDon’t look now, but the world is being overrun by zombies. Again.

We’ve seen this sort of thing before. Ever since “Night of the Living Dead” was released in 1968, we’ve experienced periodic zombie infestations — though nothing resembling an actual zombie apocalypse as of yet — and we’re in the midst of one of the most serious. They’ve invaded modern publishing, classic literature, many of our streets and, with the release of “Zombieland” tomorrow, they’ll take over our theaters. Again.

It certainly stands to reason that zombies would’ve attracted a certain level of scholarly interest, as well. Italian physicist Davide Cassidy tells us that, if pursued by a zombie horde, your best bet is to seek sanctuary in a mall, rather than, say, a deserted farmhouse. Canadian researchers have learned that, if zombies were spawned by the typically depicted brain-eating infection, humanity as we know it would almost certainly cease to exist, no matter how slowly the zombies walk. There’s even a Federal Vampire and Zombie Agency – something I missed when checking out C-SPAN during the budget hearings. But the agency has a Web site, which means it must be legit, right? 

But obviously, an onset of a zombie apocalypse would have some serious theological implications as well, and I wish some wise theologian would ponder them. But since no wise theologian would likely discuss such a scenario, I’ll ask you. Let me ask you a few quick questions: Remember, I’m just interested — there are no wrong answers … though some could potentially leave you more open to being perhaps a zombie appetizer.

1. If you saw a few zombies shambling down the street, would you …

a) Marvel at the wonder and diversity of God’s creation?

b) See the zombie as a sinner, as we all are, in need of love, support and perhaps aggressive counseling?

c) Assume that zombies are inherently evil and thwack them with a baseball bat?

2. Would the existence of zombies suggest that …

a) We’re officially in the end times, when we’re told the dead will rise again?

b) The afterlife is far more complex than we imagined?

c) We best stock up on shotgun shells and gas for the chainsaw?

3. The moment you see your first zombie, what would be your first thought?

a) “I can’t wait to hear Richard Dawkins try to explain that.”

b) “Oh, I hope it’s not somebody I know …”

c) “Man, I forgot to pick up the dry cleaning.”

4. If a zombie asked to attend church with you, would you …

a) Gladly agree, encouraged by the zombie’s interest in faith?

b) Agree — but perhaps call ahead so that one of the cry rooms might be reserved for the zombie, thus avoiding any embarrasing urges the zombie might have to snack during the sermon?

c) Suggest he just stay home and watch cable?

Post your messages down below.

Cross Purposes

September 30th, 2009

 

The famous Argonne Cross in Arlington National Cemetery could be removed if religious liberty advocates have their way. Photo courtesy Arlington National Cemetery.

The famous Argonne Cross in Arlington National Cemetery could be removed if religious liberty advocates have their way. Photo courtesy Arlington National Cemetery.

A cross honoring veterans of World War I has come under fire from civil liberties proponents, because the 6-foot cross located on federal land. The catch: the land in question, according to The Washington Post, is located in the middle of the Mojave Desert in California– a nearly deserted region surrounded by yucca and Joshua trees, where sometimes you can stand for a full hour without seeing another car trundle by.”

 

“I always say you have to risk life and limb to be offended by this cross,” says Hiram Sasser, a lawyer for the Liberty Legal Institute, which is representing the Veterans of Foreign Wars in the effort to keep the cross in place. 

While few people have ever seen the cross — especially now, since it’s covered with a plywood box to keep it from offending passers-by — the case could have far-reaching consequences for other religiously tinged war memorials. If it’s decided legally the cross must come down, it might mean other markers, including the Argonne Cross in Arlington National Cemetery and the Memorial Peace Cross in Bladensburg, might be under fire, too.

Harry Potter and the Missing Medal

September 30th, 2009

16potter.large5Former President George W. Bush sang the praises of J.K. Rowling, author of the wildly popular (and, in my opinion, very good) Harry Potter series. But according to a former Bush speechwriter, the Bush administration declined to give Rowling the Presidential Medal of Freedom because she repeatedly referenced witchcraft in them.

Matt Latimer makes the allegations in his book, “Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor,” and while the decision may look foolish now, frankly, I can understand how something like this happens. The Potter books were widely condemned from many conservative Christians when Rowling first started churning them out, and evangelicals were, of course, the cornerstone of Bush’s political support. If I was President, I’d be tempted not to anger my most boisterous supporters, too.

In hindsight, of course, the decision feels kind of silly. Not only were Rowling’s books wildly popular, not only were they extremely well written, but the final book contains, I think, one of the most mature ruminations on faith and doubt and the beauty of Christianity I’ve ever read. Not that I expect Rowling’s too torn up about it. Selling around 300 million books tends to salve a lot of wounds.

New days, same old Chuck Colson

September 29th, 2009

 

Chuck Colson

Chuck Colson

It seems we’ve been hearing a lot from Charles Colson lately. 

Not that Colson — one-time Watergate villain/fall guy, founder of Prison Fellowship and a driving force behind Christian conservatism — has ever been exactly quiet. But of all the powerful figures we’ve grown to associate with the so-called “Religious Right” — Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson et al — Colson has found a way to successfully navigate the highly politicized religion of the 1980s and ’90s to stay relevant today, even as the Religious Right has fallen on hard times. But oddly, he really hasn’t changed his message (as far as I can tell) one whit — at least not from what I can gather from this interview in Time:

The church has fallen into a therapeutic model. It believes its job is to make people happy and take care of their problems. It’s a feel-good kind of Christianity. I don’t think the job of the church is to make people happy. I think it’s to make them holy.

In the Q&A, Colson says that tying religion with politics back in the day was a mistake — a statement that might be taken as a repudiation by some of what his own movement was up to. But here’s the thing: Colson was pretty wary of politics back then, too — at least when compared to his contemporaries. Maybe it’s because Colson got his fill of politics when he worked with the late Richard Nixon, but whatever the reason, it doesn’t seem as though Colson allowed hot-button issues or monumental elections distract him from what he saw as his primary purpose: Deepening the faith of fellow Christians. Which is why he’s founded a new organization, the Chuck Colson Center, to help do just that. The online worldview resource launched this month.

“A lot of people don’t want to bother with it [serious Christianity],” Colson told Time. “[Many] people have reduced the whole Christian faith to just a relationship with Jesus. That strips the faith of its doctrine, its sovereign nature. The biggest problem is getting people to be serious about what they profess to believe.”

I don’t know what Colson’s center teaches. But I do agree with Colson that Christianity demands not just our hearts, but our minds, as well. The path Christians walk shouldn’t be easy, and it shouldn’t be pursued lightly. Christianity is meant to be more than just a talisman we hold dear when things get tough: It should be transformative. And if it’s not transforming both their own lives and the lives of people around them, well, maybe (and I say this in a spirit of self-recrimination, frankly) Christians (I) should work on that a bit.