» BACK TO BODY PARTS MAIN

Archive for the ‘culture war’ Category

Religion and Politics: Praying for the Other Side

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

David Waters posted an interesting story on The Washington Post’s “On Faith” blog, about how The Liberty Counsel is asking its members to “Adopt a Liberal” and actively pray for them. 

Liberty’s prayer list of liberals includes Democrats and Republicans — President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, but also California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

“Pick one or more of the liberals from the list we have posted online at www.LC.org, or choose your own liberal(s) to adopt,” Liberty requests. “Pray earnestly and intensely for them! Pray that the Lord would move upon them and cause them to be the kind of leaders who will encourage others to lead ‘a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence.’ We encourage you to seek the Lord’s guidance on how to pray for your liberal(s), always allowing Him to temper your prayer with His love and mercy.”

The drive implies, of course, that liberals can’t be Christian. Which, considering traditional progressive stances on such issues as abortion and same-sex marriage, some of you might agree with. Then again, perhaps there are liberal Christians out there — perhaps even reading this blog — that feel some traditionally conservative positions are inherently un-Christian, too. 

Me, I gravitate toward this post by John Shore, who’s ”exhausted with conservative Christians thinking liberal Christians wouldn’t know God’s will from a venti soy caramel latte with extra foam, and with liberal Christians thinking conservative Christians are inbred morons.”  But that’s just me.

Harry Potter and the Missing Medal

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

16potter.large5Former President George W. Bush sang the praises of J.K. Rowling, author of the wildly popular (and, in my opinion, very good) Harry Potter series. But according to a former Bush speechwriter, the Bush administration declined to give Rowling the Presidential Medal of Freedom because she repeatedly referenced witchcraft in them.

Matt Latimer makes the allegations in his book, “Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor,” and while the decision may look foolish now, frankly, I can understand how something like this happens. The Potter books were widely condemned from many conservative Christians when Rowling first started churning them out, and evangelicals were, of course, the cornerstone of Bush’s political support. If I was President, I’d be tempted not to anger my most boisterous supporters, too.

In hindsight, of course, the decision feels kind of silly. Not only were Rowling’s books wildly popular, not only were they extremely well written, but the final book contains, I think, one of the most mature ruminations on faith and doubt and the beauty of Christianity I’ve ever read. Not that I expect Rowling’s too torn up about it. Selling around 300 million books tends to salve a lot of wounds.

That ‘Other’ Baldwin Brother

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

Stephen Baldwin. Photo courtesy lukeford.net

Stephen Baldwin. Photo courtesy lukeford.net

Slate magazine, an excellent online publication that has been known to be rather critical of religion at times, ran a story on Stephen Baldwin and his involvement with the Values Voter Conference, held last week in Washington, D.C. Baldwin was primarily speaking to teens at the conference, and the story suggests the one-time actor, now full-time Christian, is attempting to mold a new, politically active Moral Majority. 

Author Christopher Beam, though clearly wary of politically active evangelicalism, gave credit where credit is due: 

[Kevin] McCullough has known Baldwin only since 2004, but by all accounts, he says, Stephen is a different person from the tabloid-fodder Hollywood star. “What his brothers will tell you is, they may not like his politics, but they can’t argue with the fact that he was once a womanizer, a drug addict, an alcoholic, an addictive personality who has been set free from all of those things.”

What most people see as a plummeting career—few would recognize any of his 30 or so movies since Half-Baked—has in fact been a deliberate rejection of Hollywood, according to McCullough. “When he came to faith, he still could have done the ‘Here, show your butt cheek and make love to this woman, and we’ll pay you $4 million.’ ” But he didn’t. Instead, he has dedicated himself to more Christian-themed movies.

It was an interesting piece — worth a look, if you’re so inclined. But in its preoccupation with politics, I do think perhaps the more important story of Baldwin’s path to Jesus, and his transformative faith, went underreported. But I’d be interested to hear what you think.

Cultivating Culture

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

 

El Greco's Pieta

El Greco's Pieta

The Evangelical Outpost, one of my favorite blogs, tipped me off to a pretty fascinating essay at The Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse. Both the original essay (by Matthew Milliner) and Tim Bartel’s take at the Outpost are both worth reading, but if I could sum up the theme of both in two sentences, it’d be this:

 

Conservatives (and evangelicals) are all-pro culture warriors, but they’re pretty amateurish when it comes to actual culture. And we really should get better.

Bartel notes that we evangelicals are trying to do better, but he worries that this new emphasis on culture is maybe more “fad” than a true cultural resurgence. “In the late 90s Christians watched Veggie Tales,” he writes. “In the late 2009 they ‘create culture,’ and maybe by 2015 they will have taken up roller-blading.”

I don’t mean to be pessimistic, because I think that Milliner is absolutely right, and that this call to care about and create culture is a much greater than a fad.  Fads take place within culture, not the other way around.  The problem with Christian fad-mongering and the problem with liberal take-over of the aesthetic realms are the same.  This problem lies in the difference between the art that replaces traditional doctrine and values and the art that doctrine and values plan for and protect.  The former type of art is predicated on the assumption that aesthetic theory and artistic creation occupy the same cultural space as theology and religious practice, and that because of this, one must make way for the other; there is no room for both.

I completely agree with Bartel. But that said, it’s imperative we use the arts to support the doctrine and values we hold so dear. Because while our values may be eternal, culture carries them forward.   

Art, music, storytelling and the like convey truths from generation to generation. They are found in the marble of Michelangelo, through the intricacies of Bach, through the stories of C.S. Lewis. Even in the Bible, it’s the stories that stick with us: Jesus spoke in parables because we’re wired to respond to them. And, let’s face it: More of us would remember Leviticus a bit more if the author had thrown a story or two in there.

Cardinal Defends Presiding Over Kennedy Funeral

Friday, September 4th, 2009

 

Cardinal Sean O'Malley. Photo by JamesPatricksMom

Cardinal Sean O'Malley. Photo by JamesPatricksMom

Last Saturday, Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, called by many “The Liberal Lion,” was commemorated in a Catholic Mass at the Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help. Cardinal Sean O’Malley presided over the Mass, earning the ire of many a Catholic: Ted Kennedy, after all, was a champion of abortion rights, and the Catholic Church is unwaveringly pro-life. And several prominent Catholics let their disappointment be known.

 

On Sept. 2, O’Malley issued a response to his critics on his blog:

We are for the precious gift of life, and our task is to build a civilization of love.  We must show those who do not share our belief about life that we care about them.  We will stop the practice of abortion by changing the law, and we will be successful in changing the law if we change people’s hearts.  We will not change hearts by turning away from people in their time of need and when they are experiencing grief and loss.

At times, even in the Church, zeal can lead people to issue harsh judgments and impute the worst motives to one another.  These attitudes and practices do irreparable damage to the communion of the Church.  If any cause is motivated by judgment, anger or vindictiveness, it will be doomed to marginalization and failure.  Jesus’ words to us were that we must love one another as He loves us.  Jesus loves us while we are still in sin.  He loves each of us first, and He loves us to the end.  

Interesting and, I think, persuasive. What are your thoughts?

Mass Transit

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Don’t believe in God? You are not … going anywhere.

 

photo courtesy Iowa Atheists & Freethinkers

photo courtesy Iowa Atheists & Freethinkers

Or so might wish Angela Shiel, a 41-year-old bus driver for the Des Moines (Iowa) Area Regional Transit Authority.

 

Shiel, according to the Des Moines Register, refused to drive a bus that bore an advertisement supporting the  Iowa Atheists and Freethinkers. She said the ad (which reads, “Don’t believe in God? You are not alone”) violated her faith. 

So far the Transit Authority has been unswayed, and Shiel’s been suspended. But frankly, the Transit Authority probably wishes the ads would just go away, too: the Transit Authority removed the ads once before after bus passengers complained. But as soon as it took ‘em down, the American Civil Liberties Union got all huffy.

I don’t like the ads myself, but I’m with the ACLU on this one: If the Freethinkers paid for the ads, you gotta put ‘em up. And bus drivers are paid to drive busses, regardless of what they’re advertising. Do you agree? Do you not? Or is this subject just a big bus ride to nowhere?